'I’d rather be a pedophile than kill a pedophile' states William Edward McDonald, aka Salamandren

https://kathleendudley.substack.com/p/id-rather-be-a-pedophile-than-kill

Comments:

Kathleen Dudley
“Tolerance will reach such a level that intelligent people will be banned from thinking so as not to offend the imbeciles.” Fyodor Dostoevsky

Kathleen Dudley
This Substack and the comments below, expose Mr. William Edward McDonald aka Salamandren with no interruptions, only facts, only first-hand experience, and quotations from the mouth of McDonald. Links following support each statement. Verifiable. Factual. The story is revealing and what we see in the end, of serious concern given that this guy alleges to teach highschool boys and girls. And makes claims about his honour and integrity which appear to be somewhat questionable in light of what he states.

https://kathleendudley.substack.com/p/id-rather-be-a-pedophile-than-kill

Jim Rizoli
Kathleen Dudley….Why do you care so much about him? Time to move on and deal with more important issues. Can you do that? I would ask you nicely to stop spamming my videos with that quote….we saw it once thats enough. Please stop or I will block you.

Respectfully disagree, Jim – VfB

Tessakai
Wow the comments section never disappoints, no matter the platform.
So many thoughts here. While I agree that the feminization of the white (AND BLACK!) men, and the hardening of the white (AND BLACK) women and mothers, is a jew crime; it’s we who allow our EGOS to interfere with the tasks at hand…NAME THE JEW (and the jew loves to divide and conquer). Now about child molesters : this is an INFAMOUS crime, aka a SERIOUS MORAL SCOURGE as recognized for 6000 years. The Jew history hiders like to try to cover up the moral scourge of child raping and killing. This dude Salamandren, never heard of him before, but I personally have distaste for true Americans that leave for WHATEVER reason (including many podcasters). Also he has a gayboy voice (I’ve known many and they weren’t “minor attracted”). That being said, I’d rather not kill anyone but society demands justice for immorality and crimes against children. I get that the “Bible” probably written by Hebrews, has some harsh punishments. Well don’t do it if you don’t want to get punished; unfortunately, attraction to children is incurable (this is well known and my uncle in law was a Trinitarian Catholic priest who was the Vicar General and confessor for many pedophile priest). Now, crimes against children aren’t just committed by men, women do it to and if a woman does it and gets less of a sentence that’s WRONG. The specific instance I’m thinking of is these bull dykes that starved and beat their white adopted babies, a few years ago. Again, the concepts of “same sex attracted” is a Jewish construct but 2 consenting adults is not the same as rape. My two shekels for what it’s worth.

Kathleen Dudley
This was the National Socialist German stance and approach to homosexuality:https://www.renegadetribune.com/national-socialist-policy-towards-homosexuals-enemies-of-the-state/

Kathleen Dudley
McDonald, looking a lot like Vladimir Lenin here, said that he never respected National Socialism b/c it reduced the Germans to a Jewish state. Just FYI 1 minute video.

Kathleen Dudley
Arthur Schopenhauer: ‘All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.’

Salamandren
You’re genuinely out of your mind, obsessed with unmasking a devil who doesn’t exist as anything other than a man uninterested in kowtowing to the conventional demands of women as pertains to civility and their topical taboos (which are the purview of women and feminized men). I think it’s a natural (female) impulse for women to civilize men by imposing censorial rules and conformist (conforming to female strictures) behavior, and yes, this all began with my video suggesting that women should never have entered male universities. You appeared in the comments talking about me being a jew and a communist and employing divide and conquer tactics (a comment you’ve since deleted, no doubt to cover your tracks), and then you found an article five years old and believed you were unmasking me. I think Jim, Bruce and Cynthia remembered that controversy from five years before and had processed it for what it was: character assassination. Jim even begins this meetup by talking about how he is so often misrepresented and painted as a devil. You should admit you’re wrong and move on. But you won’t. Because in the end, this is all about you.

McDonald states, “….looking a lot like Vladimir Lenin here, said that he never respected National Socialism b/c it reduced the Germans to a Jewish state. Just FYI 1 minute video.”

Salamandren
Over a period of 8 days in 2021, my “pedophilia series” began and ended with the idea that “systemic pedophilia” (sexualizing children in perverse, unnatural ways, including constant exposure to miscegenation and mixed-race models (such as Obama)) is the more immediate threat of pedophilia than individual males. And systemic pedophilia is the purview of the jew in all his many guises.This is why we need to break the “pedo taboo” (‘never speak of it unless denouncing it’) and address the genuine threat openly and consistently, thereby placing this subversive influence in its proper context.

Fashbird2814
I’d venture to say White men have been feminized and kicked around not because some women go to college but rather because they were in the way of jews getting to the women and children. Men were protectors. Now it seems some men have become so ineffectual that they would rather be a pedo than be the protector of society who removes a threat when needed. This is appalling. Also, isn’t it odd how much jews like to protect pedos.

Kathleen Dudley
This was a post from Gray Ghost on Renegade Tribune about McDonald aka Salamandren: And here is the Renegade Tribune link:
https://www.renegadetribune.com/jew-namer-salamandren-defends-child-rape/
Gray Ghost4 years ago”Here’s a link to Salamandren’s mother’s obituary showing who he is and that he’s a Citizen of CHINA for many years now.The CCP is using the US Freedom of Speech Laws against the US and it’s people with a Pedophile Propaganda Agent William Andrew McDonald”https://www.seacoastecho.com/obits/frances-okelley-mcdonald/article_d7e6dda4-6399-11e8-b341-03f79fa5f9b9.html

And another post by Gray Ghost:
Gray Ghost4 years ago”The day before this article in a video he said a Soldier killing someone in war was worse than a Pedophile and Made a statement of Just look into the eyes of this mongral Child. Yesterday he posted a video with a thumnail pic of large salamander green hands grabbing a very young Chinese girl playing with a teddy bear.All this as he claims to be a Teacher in China”

ʙᴏᴜɴᴅʟᴇꜱꜱ ᴇɴᴇʀɢʏSalamandren
Wouldn’t it be more sensible to avoid such controversial and ultimately misleading dichotomies? Who would willingly identify as a pedophile, and who would genuinely want to take another person’s life? The comparison falls short, unlike the simple fact that people can hold differing views on a given issue.For that very reason, it is important to choose one’s words carefully and in a way that is appropriate to the situation. Personally, I would never resort to vigilantism or take a life, although I have fortunately never been confronted with such an extreme situation. How one might truly react as a parent in such circumstances is something I would not want to speculate about.

In principle, I oppose both the death penalty and vigilantism, at least as long as there is a functioning system in place that protects citizens in a morally defensible way and in the interest of the common good.
Framing the issue as “better to be one bad thing than to do another bad thing” is ultimately irrelevant and unhelpful. A more meaningful stance would be a clear and consistent one: I condemn pedophilia just as I condemn vigilantism.

At this point, Sal, you could simply acknowledge that the comparison does not hold. That alone would allow the discussion to return to a more factual and mature level.

Salamandrenʙᴏᴜɴᴅʟᴇꜱꜱ ᴇɴᴇʀɢʏ
The context was this:

“Kill all pedos!”
“No! Killing another human being is far worse. It’s better to BE a pedo than to kill one!”

It holds. It’s a perfectly reasonable response to the insane logic of “Kill all pedos!” And that is the situation in which I produced the phrase.

If you want to take the phrase out of context, then you are the one who is being irrelevant and unhelpful. And that is where the women on this panel erred. None of the men on the panel (there were three) saw the statement as confusing or problematic, in the context in which it was presented.

There are innumerable examples where “Kill the pedo!” is a far worse crime than the crime for which the killing would be committed. Numerous celebrities from the past might serve as example: Jimmy Page having sex with a 14 year old groupie does not constitute an act worthy of murder; on and on the list goes.

I think the real issue is the fact that you want to control what I say about pedophilia, as if any statement that strays from the acceptable limits (tightly defined) must be policed.

If you want to discuss this topic in an open and rational way, you still have to begin by denouncing pedophilia. And with phrases like “Kill all pedos!” repeated every five minutes or so.

Why do you weigh in with claims of “You shouldn’t say that!” when clearly I am trying to find ways of countering a false set of assumptions about pedophilia, which is (I agree) a stupidly sensitive topic so often incredibly misunderstood due precisely to the kind of sensitivity that your response evinces.

This sensitivity (this virtue-splaining) is (as I said in the video) connected with the anti-male tendencies in society generally, where 99 percent of the ‘sensitive’ pedophilia incidents are male.

Your comment is a perfect example of ‘telling men how not to act’. But it’s a near certainty that you don’t recognize that fact.

What if Monika on this panel had said the exact same words I said in this video (as relates to my argument and the events described). I say, the response would be entirely different, both from the women on the panel and you.

It’s a destructive form of sexism, and it is emasculating men to a point where they are not standing up against gay marriage and transexual dance pole visits to kindergartens (as they should) because they are constantly being told how they should NOT act, including the most basic impulses they possess as relate to sex.

While women are as constantly encouraged to be true to themselves, to believe they know better than the men how men should talk about issues like pedophilia, and ‘liberate’ themselves from the male strictures, etc…

I don’t need policing when it comes to this topic. And making claims about me personally as a result of the fact that I wish to analyze the topic in this way (on my bitchute channel through a vlog format I’ve used now in nearly 1000 videos) is simply a manner of silencing me, even in your comment….

You want to be relevant and clear? Say “This is a tough topic. I respect the fact that you have chosen to take it on. I wish people were more open to hearing an honest response from a man’s perspective, but sadly, they aren’t.”

Kathleen Dudleyʙᴏᴜɴᴅʟᴇꜱꜱ ᴇɴᴇʀɢʏ
You will note if you clostely listen and watch his videos and interviews, Mr. McDonald’s literary style, both written and verbal, “invites misunderstanding” as you astutely point out in your comment above. Michael Hanscher, https://www.jstor.org/stable/430352?seq=1 writes about this in his “Humpty Dumpty and Verbal Meaning essay. I have come across other academics who use language to incite, to enrage, to obfuscate and twist in order to create outrage and stir up trouble. I see this as Mr. McDonald’s method, with no intention to bring clarity such as how you express your own position.

Kathleen Dudley
Here is the Renegade Tribune article September 22, 2021 called “jew-Namer” Salamandren Defends Child Rape:
https://www.renegadetribune.com/jew-namer-salamandren-defends-child-rape/

The comments below the video (video scrubbed, but if someone knows how to use the Wayback Machine, no doubt it can be found and reclaimed) align with 99% with the ones in these comments on Jim Rizoli’s post. They are worth reading, just to know the posture of honourable men and women, then and today.

Yes, he exposes himself. His real name is Wiliam Edward McDonald, verified in his mother’s obituary (link in the comments below in the Renegade Tribune article). And his moniker is decoded as: Salem Andren. And here are some quotes from the Renegade Tribune, September 22, 2021. Hold on:“jew-Namer” Salamandren Defends Child Rape

“Salamandren thinks that the only reason nationalists want to kill pedos is because we have been brainwashed by feminists, who just want to control what men can do with their penises. This guy is seriously sick.”

McDonald states: “It’s better to be a pedophile than to kill a pedophile.”

The journalist goes on to state: “In case you are unaware of this guy, he is a supposed “pro-White anti-semite” who lives in China, presumably to escape justice for his crimes against children. He has been interviewed by “Handsome Truth, ”where he shilled hard for child rapists. Honestly, his rhetoric is not much different than Andrew Anglin (https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/andrew-anglin/} and a lof of other “meninist” activists out there.”

Here’s his [McDonald’s] quotation:
“Because your psychotic desire to kill pedophiles is nothing more or less than Anti-Male, which has turned all of you into pussies.”

AMERICA IS MYSTERY BABYLON THE GREAT. Revelation 17
I would rather kill 1 Billion Pedophiles than molest 1 Child. The only reason someone would defend Pedophilia is because 1.) They are a Closeted Pedophile.
2.). They are a Closeted Pedophile.

Much more at https://www.bitchute.com/video/DEJvOVdSA9a5